Home to PERFECTPINTS

The perfect pint (of Guinness)

by Chief Perfectionist

The perfect pint of Guinness is an alchemy of many elements. Following my initial 30 day, 30 pint, 30 pub tour that started the whole idea for Perfectpints.com, these were the components most discussed in each of the pubs …

Temperature: To me, this has the greatest effect on the overall taste of the pint, and I like my pints as close to room temperature as I can get. The overall perfect pint was the only pint I found served at room temperature. Guinness Extra Cold failed for a reason.

Flow: Simply put, the more Guinness that is flowing, the better. It’s better to grab a pint in a busy pub later in the night. You really don’t want to have the first pint of the evening, and this is probably the reason why pints at restaurants and hotels generally didn’t fare as well. I could discuss “freshness” separately, but the better the flow, the fresher the Guinness is. This might not stop someone from selling Guinness that is out of date and I had one pint that I can say bordered on “spoiled.”

Clean lines: It would make sense that the lines leading to the tap should be cleaned often. You may have heard of the Guinness Quality Team that travels to all the pubs in Ireland and perform checks and routine maintenance. Some claim the length of the lines to the tap is also a consideration, the shorter being better.

Clean glasses: Many swear that a good pint leaves a nice film the whole way down the glass. This may have more to do with whether the glass is clean and what it has been cleaned with. I will say the better pints of Guinness left rings down the glass. Also, serve Guinness in a real pint glass.

The pour: Guinness mentions a six-part pouring process taking 119.5 seconds. We already talked about the right, clean glass. Next you keep the glass on an angle and when making the first pour. You’re not supposed to let the tap touch the beer at any time. Then the glass is set to settle. Once settled, you top up the pint and present it. Guinness has in its guidelines a two-pour process, but I love the old-style, three pours and the head cut off with a bread knife.

The magic: A great pint of Guinness is a state of mind and not just an engineering exercise. A great looking pub, in a fantastic locale can’t make up for a lousy pint, but I do believe it can tip the scales between good and great, or great and perfect. However, I’ve had some excellent pints in what would be considered pretty lousy pub settings. (Morgan recently suggested that the quality of the pint is inversely proportional to cleanliness of the bathrooms. For me at least, that has been the case more times than not.) The publican, the people you’re with, the craic … these are the things that cannot be codified through a quality management process.

What’s most important to you in nominating a perfect pint?

This entry was posted in Perfection and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

4 Comments

  1. Mar 31st, 2010

    ‘I like your manifesto let’s put it to the testo’ As the Sultans of Ping said.

    Can you blind tell a guinnes poured in 6,3,2 or 1 goes apart?
    Would you say guinees is you favorite pint of stout in a blind test?
    http://www.irishcraftbrewer.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=145&Itemid=36

  2. Chief Perfectionist
    Apr 2nd, 2010

    I believe I could tell a pint of Guinness apart from the rest in a blind taste test.

  3. Apr 5th, 2010

    I would bet you could spot the Guinness blind. With the possibility of mixing up Beamish with it. More interesting is which one someone prefers when they don’t have branding information to bias the decision.

    I have serious doubts anyone can tell whether a stout has had 1,2 or 6 pours.

  4. Chief Perfectionist
    Apr 5th, 2010

    You’re absolutely right. I doubt anyone could tell a stout apart (by taste) that had multiple pours. If anything, the two-part pour has more effect on the head, and even then, that’s more down to the nitrogenisation of the beer.

    It certainly has a lot to do with branding and maintaining the myth of the brand. Some may argue that observing the ‘ritual’ of the correct pour and presentation meets an expectation of experience that transcends rationality. Equally powerful stuff.

    I’m reminded of a research study around vodka where they took the same expensive vodka and kept it in its own bottle, as well as placing it in a cheap competitors bottle. I’m sure you can guess which vodka was overwhelmingly preferred, even though both were exactly the same, only the labels were different.

    I’ve also witnessed people in a workshop unable to tell the difference between Tesco sparkling water and San Pellegrino even though there is a 5x difference in price between the two.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Recent Comments

    • Chief Perfectionist

      You’re absolutely right. I doubt anyone could tell a stout apart (by taste) that had multiple pours. If anything, the two-part pour has more effect on the head, and...

    • iamreddave

      I would bet you could spot the Guinness blind. With the possibility of mixing up Beamish with it. More interesting is which one someone prefers when they don’t have branding...

    • Chief Perfectionist

      I believe I could tell a pint of Guinness apart from the rest in a blind taste test.

    • iamreddave

      ‘I like your manifesto let’s put it to the testo’ As the Sultans of Ping said. Can you blind tell a guinnes poured in 6,3,2 or 1 goes apart? Would you say guinees...

    • Leon

      Well done all, love how it looks. Go Northwest, bring it on..